Supernatural Bible Changes… Debunking the Scoffers Using Their Own Words

The scoffers are fond of asking, (and I’ve heard it dozens of times) Why don’t the “Mandela Effect’ changes ever alter well known scriptures? Why not John 3:16 so we can all verify it. This is a false claim, and I’ll prove it using their very own words.

While John 3:16 is the most well known verse in the New Testament, it is not the most well known verse in the Bible as they falsely claim. The most well known verse in the Bible is Genesis 1:1.

Genesis 1:1 (KJV)

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Here it is, Genesis 1:1, the most well known verse in the entire Bible, and what do you know it HAS been changed! Heaven used to be heavens plural. We know it was heavens plural before because the Bible teaches at least three heavens. It seems the only ones who don’t understand this are the scoffers.

If you say it out loud with the new heaven singular, it doesn’t roll off the tongue the way it used to. Heaven singular is not correct. Don’t just take my word for it. We have a meme created back in 2003 before the satanic “Mandela Effect, or Quantum Effect” changes began. There are hundreds of them we could have chosen from.

Here is another:

Ahead we will be examining more highly quoted and popular verses to see if they have been corrupted. These will have more significant changes.

Let’s try an experiment with a very, very well known passage. Please fill in the blanks in this verse. (don’t feel bad if you can’t)

1 Peter 4:8

And above all things have fervent ________ among yourselves: for _______ shall cover a multitude of sins.

Did you fill in the blanks with the word love? That is the correct answer that we (long time Christians) all know and remember. This is how it reads today:

1 Peter 4:8 (KJV)

And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall cover the multitude of sins.

I have never met anyone who remembers “charity shall cover the multitude of sins”. The scoffers will even give you the same correct quote from memory. But, when shown the Bible corruption they will say that it has always read charity in that verse.

They will ever so predictably explain that people have just been accustomed to saying love instead of charity. They’ll even give an anecdotal story to support their claim. They’ll tell you that somebody hundreds of years ago said love instead of charity and it spread and stuck to this day. No really, that’s what they say!

This verse has been read aloud to church goers hundreds of millions of times through the centuries by pastors, ministers, and teachers and no one ever thought to correct it? Preposterous! These are the levels that the scoffers stoop to.

There is a pattern of changing out love for charity in well known verses. The Apostle Paul’s very famous “Way of Love” is completely gutted. Sorry scoffers, but this is a very well known passage. The title above 1 Corinthians 13:13 says “The Way of Love” It is correct there, but not in the chapter. It now reads:

1 Corinthians 13 King James Version (KJV)

1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing.

And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing.

Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,

Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;

Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;

Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.

Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

13 And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.

The greatest of these is charity? Is that what you remember? I have never heard anyone say that in my entire life – ever! Except for the scoffers come lately.

What about the millions of sermons preached in church Sunday services? Can you imagine any pastor actually standing up on the pulpit and telling his congregation, “if I give all I have to feed the poor, but don’t have charity I am nothing”? That would be a very asinine thing to say. That won’t preach brother! If you give everything you have to feed the poor, that is the very definition of charity!

Why are these changes so important? It demotes love. Love is the greatest gift that God bestowed upon humanity. This is an attack on love.

1 John 4  (KJV)
He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.

 

To those on the left charity is taking someone else’s money by force with a threat of imprisonment to care for those who in many cases will not work, and grow the oppressive nanny state. For them charity works out fine. Thus the attack on 1 Corinthians 13.

Let’s briefly revisit:

1 Peter 4:8 (KJV)

8 “…charity shall cover the multitude of sins.”

The in the phrase above is a definite article. The correct grammar would have been to use an a (indefinite article) instead. With the corrupt the it’s referring to the multitude instead of a multitude of sins. What it is now saying, I’ll paraphrase, is: charity shall cover the multitude of their sins.

Don’t fall for the sophistry and misdirection of the scoffers. Our Bibles are changing supernaturally! There is a war going on!

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save
Save



Every dollar of your donation enables us to reach 20 more believers and non-believers alike with this very important and life changing information regarding the ongoing assault on our God, our faith and our Bibles!

3 Replies to “Supernatural Bible Changes… Debunking the Scoffers Using Their Own Words”

  1. Hello
    I would like to state that John 3:16 has been changed from (shall) to (should) not even the same.

    John 3:16 (KJV)
    For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

    1. You are right the word should is not definitive, shall is. The word IN used to be ON as well. The demons believe in Jesus, while we believe on Jesus. The reason I did not include this verse as an example is that the scoffers know that other Bible versions already made these changes (man-made) at the editors desk decades ago. They say, “so what, these are trivial changes.” To you and I however these are very important changes.

  2. I’m not sure I agree with the previous comments. It was always should and not shall, so I don’t think that is a change. Although, I do tend to agree that it was “ON” instead of “in.”

    I don’t want to start making obscure and odd guesses and fill the blog up with worthless clutter, so please pardon me if this is a bad example. I read Nehemiah 13:26 the other day and I wondered about the word “outlandish.” I am NOT saying this is a mandela effect, but I would like to ask others about it. Do you recall “outlandish” as being in the KJV? I really don’t remember for sure, so cannot make any claims, but this does seem like an unusual word for the KJV, where something like “pagan” or “foreign” would have seemed more likely.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *